Skip to content

bilski going up to the supremes

2009 February 3

As most readers probably know, Bilski was a rather important case on patent law in the US. There have been many, many, many analyses and commentaries on the impact of the decision of the federal circuit court which would significantly limit the patentability of business methods. In short - patents would only be available if embodied within a machine or transformed one tangible thing into another.

According to SCOTUSblog, the decision is being appealed:

“This case,” the petition’s opening line says, “raises the most fundamental question in patent law: what can be patented? Are patents only for manufacturing processes that are tied to a particular machine or produce some physical transformation? Or do patents also embrace modern business procsses that do not depend on a particular machine or device?”

First time since 1981 since the Supreme Court has considered this, according to SCOTUSblog. Patent agents everywhere await with bated breath.

  • Google Bookmarks
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Print
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • MSN Reporter
  • NewsVine
  • Posterous
  • SphereIt
  • Sphinn
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks

related:

  1. us supreme court releases bilski decision on patents
  2. arbitrary electronic search & seizure + canadian border = ok
  3. patent tides turning?
  4. Vista Capable — Capable of Booting — And Not Much Else
  5. after one gpl body blow, skype yells uncle

One Response leave one →
  1. Dr. Kopp E. Wright permalink
    February 4, 2009

    YO.…No creation.…no transformation.…..then NO PATENT.….that simple.….quit whining.

    Dr. K.E. Wright

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

Switch to our mobile site